Weekly Discussion: Series vs. Stand Alones

This week I'm going to be talking about the pro and cons of series and stand alone novels. Marginally, I prefer stand alones over series. I think it is much harder to write a stand alone. To make a story interesting and intriguing and have a large climax but yet get everything wrapped together in about 300 pages is not that easy. I'm assuming. But I think if you write a series you never need to have a set conclusion till the end of the series which is usually a minimum of 3 but can be 7-10.

Another reason I love stand alone novels is with all the books I read it is so hard to keep series separate. And I don't always have time to reread the books before the newest book. And books like the Private or Pretty Little Liars have so many books and twists. Plus its sometimes almost a year since I read the last book. Its very hard to keep everything straight. And also very frustrating to be confused.

There is also ways to tastefully do series. I love series that each book has a definite conclusion and that you would be fairly satisfied if the series ended there. Examples of this are The Mortal Instruments and Twilight Saga. Don't get me wrong I love to read series they just frustrate me somewhat.

So what do you think? Which do you prefer? What are your favorite series? Leave your thoughts in the comments!

Keep Reading

Weekly Discussion: Prologues

This week we are discussing prologues. In the weekly discussion I share my thoughts on a topic and you can also share yours in the in comments. I am always open to topic ideas. If you have an idea, leave a comment. On to my thoughts ...

In general, most prologues bother me. In all the books I've read I’ve seen three different types. One, it describes an event in the middle of the story. The prologue scene may appear in the book (Books 1-3 in Dark Guardian Series) or it might just be an extra tidbit (Twilight Saga). Two, the event takes place in the past and gives the set-up or background story. These usually start the first chapter with a year or x amount of days/weeks/years later. Three, the event takes place right before the first chapter in almost chronological order. These are usually in a different point of view that the normal chapters.
What bothers me the most about prologues is the spoiler nature of some of them. Type one is the worst. I don't flip my book to the middle read a page and then start the book. But that is what they are basically doing. I feel that these types of prologues are big wastes of paper. We know there is going to be action; at least we hope there will be. Since these prologues do not enhance the story in any way, there really is no point in including them.
Type two I have a love-hate relationship with. In some cases they are essential to the story, but in others, they are not. In most cases I feel that in the first chapter when you are getting to the character it could be used as a memory, eliminating the prologue altogether. But in other cases (like The Body Finder), a prologue is acceptable.
I think type three is the only really acceptable prologues. I am assuming authors put the scene as a prologue so as to not cause confusion and I understand this. Cassandra Clare's City of Ashes tastefully does the type three prologue. The only complaint I have is it’s a bit long for prologue.
Overall I feel that prologues should be short backgrounds or other information that is essential in the story. All prologues should be absolutely spoiler free.
Now its time for you to share your thoughts. Do you like prologues? Which type(s) do you find acceptable? What are some examples of good usage of prologues? Bad usage?